Has any one seen the movie in India, except those people in the news channels , I have seen the movie 3 times just to make sure that i am not missing out anything. The movie is a crap, no logic, no story , oh my god , the song , i came out of the hall before it begin. I have seen a lot of movies , I see about 6 movies a week , so trust me , I have seen more movies which deserve the awards , then this crape. If i am wrong , comment on this.
After the amended Information Technology Act made it illegal to publish and transmit obscene material or any sexually explicit act/content last month, a newly passed IT Bill is set to punish offenses revolving around child pornography.
So what exactly has been touted as an offense? The new bill is set to make it illegal to not only create and transmit child pornography in any electronic form, but even to browse it, as reported by The Times of India. Publishing and transmitting material depicting children in a "obscene or indecent or sexually explicit manner" can put you behind bars for a long duration - five years, not to mention the hefty Rs. 10 lakh fine it attracts.
Section 67 of the existing act will now be amended. Section 67B proposes particularly to punish acts of publishing and transmitting any electronic sexually explicit act/content that depicts children as opposed to Section 67, which does not specifically mention children anywhere. Now, it will also be an offence to "cultivate, entice or induce children to have an online relationship with other children for a sexual act," the report added. (Report : Techtree.com)
The Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) has added a feather to its cap. It is delivering on schedule— in 2009— India's first indigenously built nuclear powered submarine (SSBN) as it had promised at the beginning of the United Progressive Alliance's (UPA) term in office.
The secret of the indigenous nuclear submarine programme seems to be finally out. Defence minister A. K. Antony has confirmed what was being speculated all this while - that the country is ready to launch the third arm of its nuclear triad.
India is getting a batch of submarine launched ballistic missiles (SLBM) and submarine- launched cruise missiles (SLCM), ready to wed with the SSBNs, which would presumably be nuclear tipped. This would, in turn, underline the deterrence posture of the nuclear weapons programme providing it a failsafe 'second strike' capability.
But this would also entail fundamental change in the country's nuclear weapons policies for the peculiar nature of nuclear submarine deployment.
A nuclear submarine remains submerged underwater for most of its deployment period thus making communication difficult especially in times of a national emergency.
A nuclear submarine commander is therefore armed with a separate launch regimen that is qualitatively different from those used above ground.
Hence, when India launches its nuclear submarine, reportedly three, it would have to put in place launch codes that would provide a degree of autonomy to the commanders. This, in turn, would change the deployment pattern of at least a portion of the country's nuclear forces to 'ready arsenal'. This would require a political decision.
The Indian development is important in terms of the changing Chinese deployment by which they are modernising their nuclear submarine fleet, putting into waters the refurbished Xia class and a new Jin class.
The country had been working on the submarine, coyly termed Advanced Technology Vehicle (ATV) since 1985. The design is reportedly based on the old Charlie II- class submarine - a former Soviet make.
The programme was bedevilled with problems in developing a reactor suitable for the platform and then, building a containment vessel for the reactor. The attack submarine design is said to have a 4,000- ton displacement and a single- shaft, home- built nuclear power plant.
The estimated speed of the vessel is 12- 15 knots on surface, and 30- 34 knots submerged.
The reactor is of the pressurised water variety.
The nuclear submarine would beef up the country's presence in the Indian Ocean.
It brings to fruition a programme that was kicked off under the leadership of the late Rajiv Gandhi who had leased a Charlie- class nuclear submarine that was renamed in 1988 as INS Chakra.
What is happening in India ? We are having a national debate about whether women should drink or not, whether women have right to have a drink ? When Sri Ram Sena roughed up a few women , the nation went up in arms ? All the English 24 hr NEWS channels telecasted the story for nearly 3 days. In between a clergy in UP issued a fatwa against women studding along with boys, not a sole in this country notices. The so called secular batons of this country raise a finger. Why ? because that was fatwa and if we appose any fatwa , we will be branded as Hindu right wing terrorist. There was no live telecast of passionate debate in Headlines Today ! "o" sorry Entertainment Today ! No Burkha Dutt the award winning journalist trying a put words into people mouth in the name of national debate. The News channels are behaving like any thing Hindus dose is wrong and any thing against is secularism. Why? the majority of Hindus doesn't case what others tell about them , Hindus are only people in the world who take things laying down again and again, should this change ? Will like to know your views.
Read more...Are we living in a Democratic country? If yes, can we ban these English news channels?
The minister Renuka Chowdhury states that the state government has lost control of the law and order , where was she when Raj of Mumbai was attacking north Indians, she did not open her mouth because the state government was a Congress one.
Date Feb 8 2009
Two days after the attack on CPM MLA's daughter and her friend, the accused claim to be a part of CPM's student wing-the DYFI. More shockingly, these men say that their attempt was to protect the MLA's daughter's modesty. While police refused to share details,the arrested claim they belong to CPM's student wing - the DYFI. On asked as to which party they belonged, the driver of the bus the couple was travelling in - Arvind Das said, "DYFI." Surprisingly, the accused claim they were keeping the MLA's daughter out of harm's way. "They were oly trying to protect the girl's modesty from being compromised," defence lawyer
© Blogger templates The Professional Template by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008
Back to TOP
